MAKE A MEME
View Large Image
| View Original: | Newton_-_Flamsteed_Controversy.jpg (5600x4800) | |||
| Download: | Original | Medium | Small | Thumb |
| Courtesy of: | www.flickr.com | More Like This | ||
| Keywords: newton - flamsteed controversy newtonflamsteedcontroversy text Newton-Flamsteed Controversy Scientists, even in the calibre of Isaac Newton are not always perfect. Newton plagiarized John Flamsteed (who died #onthisday in 1719) data without even an acknowledgment in his third edition of Principia. Isaac Newton needed astronomical data to give a full theory of the motion of the moon, something which he had left incomplete in the first edition of the Principia. In the summer of 1694 Newton met John Flamsteed who was the King’s Astronomical Observator — the first English Astronomer Royal, at the Royal Observatory. Newton persuaded Flamsteed to give him 50 of his observations of the moon, and he also managed to get a promise of another 100 observations. In return Flamsteed made Newton promise only to use them personally and not to make them public. Newton promised Flamsteed fame if the observations were published along with his theory. Latter a controversy erupted over the publication of Flamsteed excellent stellar observations. Flamsteed struggled to withhold them until completed, but they were urgently needed by Isaac Newton and Edmond Halley, among others. Newton, through the Royal Society published Flamsteed excellent and careful stellar observations in 1704 despite Flamsteed’s objections, the incomplete observations were edited by Halley, and 400 copies were printed in 1712. Flamsteed later managed to collect and burn 300 of them. Flamsteed data were included in the 2nd/third edition of Principia without acknowledgment Flamsteed was a diligent and careful observers. His own star catalogue, Historia Coelestis Britannica (1725), listed more stars (3,000) and gave their positions much more accurately than did any other previous work. Some stars, such as 61 Cygni, are still known by their numbers in his system. Newton-Flamsteed Controversy Scientists, even in the calibre of Isaac Newton are not always perfect. Newton plagiarized John Flamsteed (who died #onthisday in 1719) data without even an acknowledgment in his third edition of Principia. Isaac Newton needed astronomical data to give a full theory of the motion of the moon, something which he had left incomplete in the first edition of the Principia. In the summer of 1694 Newton met John Flamsteed who was the King’s Astronomical Observator — the first English Astronomer Royal, at the Royal Observatory. Newton persuaded Flamsteed to give him 50 of his observations of the moon, and he also managed to get a promise of another 100 observations. In return Flamsteed made Newton promise only to use them personally and not to make them public. Newton promised Flamsteed fame if the observations were published along with his theory. Latter a controversy erupted over the publication of Flamsteed excellent stellar observations. Flamsteed struggled to withhold them until completed, but they were urgently needed by Isaac Newton and Edmond Halley, among others. Newton, through the Royal Society published Flamsteed excellent and careful stellar observations in 1704 despite Flamsteed’s objections, the incomplete observations were edited by Halley, and 400 copies were printed in 1712. Flamsteed later managed to collect and burn 300 of them. Flamsteed data were included in the 2nd/third edition of Principia without acknowledgment Flamsteed was a diligent and careful observers. His own star catalogue, Historia Coelestis Britannica (1725), listed more stars (3,000) and gave their positions much more accurately than did any other previous work. Some stars, such as 61 Cygni, are still known by their numbers in his system. | ||||
